Nevada Supreme Court case tests limits on court transparency

Danielle Bennett Social Work Practicum Student
Danielle Bennett Social Work Practicum Student - ACLU of Nevada Website
0Comments

Holland & Hart and the ACLU of Nevada have collaborated on an amicus brief submitted to the Nevada Supreme Court. The case concerns the right of Nevadans to access court proceedings, a matter brought into focus by actions taken by the Murdoch family.

The Murdochs are involved in a high-profile dispute over their family fortune. Their legal team has been instrumental in advocating for new statutes, NRS 164.041 and NRS 669.256, which some interpret as allowing automatic sealing of trust-related documents and closed hearings. This development has raised concerns about transparency since neither media nor public can access these proceedings.

In response, seven national news organizations, including The New York Times and CNN, have petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to overturn this sealing order on constitutional grounds.

The ACLU of Nevada, with pro bono assistance from Holland & Hart’s appellate team, filed an amicus brief supporting this petition. Christopher Peterson, Legal Director at ACLU of Nevada, emphasized the importance of public access to courtrooms: “Over the last two weeks, thousands of Nevadans voted in judicial elections across our state… The First Amendment guarantees that everyone has the right to see what is going on in our courtrooms.”

The ACLU’s involvement underscores its commitment to maintaining transparency within Nevada’s judicial system. It references past efforts like Falconi v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court that affirmed civil proceedings should be public unless privacy concerns warrant otherwise.

The organization also argues against legislative overreach into judicial matters—a potential violation of constitutional separation of powers—highlighting how recent statutes could undermine judiciary independence.

As briefing continues through mid-December, it remains uncertain if oral arguments will be heard by the court.

For further insights into this case’s implications both locally and nationally, Holland & Hart appellate partner Abe Smith is available for commentary through Debbie Campbell at 720-272-8954.



Related

Athar Haseebullah, Executive Director of the ACLU of Nevada

Federal court rules in favor of ACLU of Nevada in class action immigration lawsuit

A federal court ruled that certain U.S. immigration detention policies violate federal law following an ACLU lawsuit. Hundreds held under these policies may now seek bond hearings before judges—a move described as critical by local advocates.

Athar Haseebullah, Executive Director of the ACLU of Nevada

ACLU of Nevada files motion to compel DMV to release records on ICE communications

The ACLU of Nevada has asked a judge for an order requiring state motor vehicle officials release more than one hundred withheld documents related to communication with federal immigration authorities. The request comes amid allegations about transparency issues at state agencies following revelations concerning encrypted messaging use.

Caitlin J. Saladino, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Development & Operations

UNLV alumna Caren Yap leads AFL-CIO policy efforts for 12 million workers

Caren Yap, an alumna of UNLV, now leads major labor policy initiatives for over 12 million workers through AFL-CIO Advocacy Hub. Her journey from immigrant roots in Las Vegas to national policymaking was shaped by personal experience and mentorship at Brookings Mountain West.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Silver State Journal.