Senate Bill 415, aimed at establishing automated traffic enforcement cameras across Nevada, has been shelved after failing to move beyond committee review. This legislation, supported by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) and Clark County, concludes its journey in this legislative session after missing the committee deadline. The ACLU of Nevada opposed the bill, citing constitutional, data privacy, and fee collection concerns.
Despite the halt of Senate Bill 415, the ACLU of Nevada warns that similar proposals remain in motion. Assembly Bill 402, which proposes automated traffic enforcement specifically in construction zones, is still advancing. The organization maintains its opposition due to similar concerns.
Athar Haseebullah, the executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, criticized the now-dead bill, stating, "This bill was bad policy from the start. The deployment of red-light cameras is often framed as a matter of public safety, but in reality, most civil liberties abuses happen under the guise of public safety."
Haseebullah further noted that these systems present constitutional concerns and often become revenue-generating tools for the government. Other regions have faced significant financial payouts due to flawed systems. He also mentioned the challenge in overseeing such programs due to lack of comprehensive access to surveillance tools and data usage.
He concluded by expressing approval of the Nevada Senate's decision, urging the legislature to remain cautious of the potential harms posed by automated traffic enforcement systems.
###