Senate Bill 415, which proposed the installation of automated traffic enforcement cameras across Nevada, will not move forward. The bill failed to progress out of committee before the deadline last Friday, ending its prospects for this legislative session. The ACLU of Nevada strongly opposed the bill due to concerns over constitutional rights, data privacy, and fee collection practices.
The organization continues to express concern about other legislation like Assembly Bill 402, which has advanced and would permit automated traffic enforcement in construction zones. The ACLU opposes this bill on similar grounds.
Athar Haseebullah, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, stated: "This bill was bad policy from the start. The deployment of red-light cameras is often framed as a matter of public safety, but in reality, most civil liberties abuses happen under the guise of public safety. Automated traffic enforcement systems, which raise significant constitutional concerns, are problematic tools that are used to generate revenue for the government on the backs of ordinary Nevadans."
Haseebullah further commented on oversight issues: "From a practical perspective, the Legislature couldn’t exercise oversight of the data collected through these programs because it is not privy to every surveillance tool law enforcement has in its possession and how that data is used." He commended the Nevada Senate for halting progress on this bill and urged lawmakers to consider potential harms associated with automated traffic enforcement systems.
The ACLU of Nevada remains committed to defending civil liberties and rights in Nevada since its establishment in 1966.